Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Necrophiliac!!!
Sorry but i have to take a moment for this necrophiliac stuff... In my opinion Flaubert is just as guilty of being a nasty person. For anyone who finds joy in watching a mental person having sex with a corpse is obviously a twisted psycho! And the fact that he has the audacity to call him a coward because he couldn't stomach a decapitated corpse! Who is the coward? Flaubert? For in my eyes it is Flaubert! He constantly needs to make himself feel normal and will use any method the sick freak can get away with.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
To be fair to Flaubert, he has nothing really to do with this admittedly disturbing incident. The real question is why Barnes includes it. Does the decapitation represent a disruption of what is--in a very bizarre way--a 'normal' routine for this mental patient? Is Barnes' novel itself 'decapitated' (or ruptured) in some way? I wonder.
Post a Comment