Friday, January 23, 2009
Simply a Reproduction
Michael Cunningham's reproduction/add-on of Mrs. Dalloway isn't exactly a novel I would choose to read on my own. I like the idea of including multiple characters that all tie together in the novel, but on the other hand the constant exchange of point of views and inconsistency to fully get a point across leaves me with not only a frustration but a lack of interest to actually read anymore. I find the character of Laura Brown to the be the most interesting because she is original and not just a carbon-copy that just barely matches of another character. Clarissa Vaughn... i feel like anyone could reproduce her in the way that Cunningham does. He simply chooses another time, similar circumstance, and the same feelings and connections to relive what Woolf wrote about Clarissa Dalloway. The reproduction of the character is not only redundant but simple. Writing about Woolf, i feel that Cunningham pulled lots of connections that Woolf made to herself in Mrs. Dalloway to create his pieces about the suicidal author. Writing about a person who existed, especially one who expressed through her writing multiple aspects of her own beliefs, seems risky and like we don't really know what's true. I feel as though overall Cunningham uses The Hours as a work of reproduction that could be done without. The story of the three women can be intriguing, but the idea that we have read all of this before leaves is bland and uneventful. Maybe this book would be different, more of mystery and less of a guided reproduction in the reader's eyes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I do agree with you on all points, yet while the reproduction is a tad odd, i dont think that it should be too disrespected. Though I believe it is indeed pretty weak, it is well done, and some credit is due.
I do not necessarily agree with the assertion that anyone could portray Clarissa Dalloway like Cunningham does. I feel the opposite about Mrs. Brown, I think that she is boring and kind of an add in. She is someone new who does things that were not already done in Mrs. Dalloway, but I don't think that that is the point of this novel. This is a remake. I feel like when he sticks to the Mrs. Dalloway plot his writing is the most compelling. It is a little cheesy that he writes about Woolf. It is almost like, what right does he have to pretend to be her? Why don't I remake Romeo and Juliet and pretend to be Shakespeare? I see where you are coming from, but I don't think that I agree. I think that it is a cool idea. How often have you read a book and wondered if you could do better? Cunningham I don't think beleives that he is better, but I think that this book is an experiment. An inventive experiment. Almost like a long writing excersize.
i agree on many points. i wouldn't have picked this novel either. However i do like the connections between the three women even though they are years apart they have very similar issues.
Ken,
I agree, it was a pretty bold move on Cunninghams part by recreating Dalloway's story and writing about Woolf
I totally agree with you on Clarissa Vaughn, but I disagree with you on Mrs. Brown. I find her to be very lacking in character, she has a one track mind that is obsessive (but not as well-crafted obsession as Barnes did in Flaubert's Parrot). She doesn't have "a cave" behind her. I may turn out to be wrong and Cunningham may develop her character incredibly well, but right now I just can't seem to appreciate her character. And as for the Virginia Woolf chapters, I think I personally like them so much because they are so risky, but so well done that I read her character like one he created for the novel
Kenya,
An interesting post--especially for the comment it has engendered. I'll shut up and let you weigh what your peers have to say (they make some good points).
Post a Comment