The combination of lust and murder throughout Hamlet creates clashing outlooks for the female roles. Although there Shakespeare crams a lot of themes into his plays, which make the tales of Romeo and Juliette, Taming of the Shrew and many other Shakespearean stories relevant to contemporary life, the overall acknowledgement of women in Hamlet, does seem more negative than that of today.
Right off the bat Gertrude is perceived as an “incestuous” bride for marrying within a month of Hamlet’s father’s death (Act 1.2). The audience never hears a soliloquy or independent speech that givers Gertrude’s point of view. Even though she probably doesn’t deserve it, there is never time to find out whether or not there is true love between her and Claudius. It is all from Hamlet, the man’s point of view, and women are initially seen as deceiving and “whore-like.” We never really get to understand what Gertrude’s motives and involvement were with the death of her husband, it almost seems as if her reputation as a character is sought after more than the power hungry Claudius. It is evident from the initial introduction of Gertrude that women are not perceived as they are today (which is partly due to the fact that it was in the era, but isn’t Shakespeare supposed to be this genius who writes meaningful plays that have lasted for centuries as a form of “excellent writing??)
Then there is Ophelia. Between her brother telling her that Hamlet’s love will be short lived, her father conspiring against her lover with her letters, and Hamlet telling her to go to a “nunnery” (Act 3.1), it is no surprise she is driven mad. Ophelia’s mistreatment and her road to madness makes me give a second thought to Shakespeare’s motives. Shakespeare obviously understood the public disdain and mistreatment towards women or it wouldn’t have been included in his plays, however by having Ophelia go mad is he trying to represent how it’s surprising that all women don’t go mad because of all the discrimination during this era? I don’t know how if I want to give him credit for this because throughout the play Hamlet’s is constantly calling his mother and Ophelia whores as well as metaphorically integrating it into the rest of his language.
In a roundabout sort of way this comes back to the combination of lust and murder throughout the play. In between all the discrimination of women there is all this violence succumbed by the essence of love. Ophelia drowning herself and Gertrude remarrying so quickly cause turmoil that has the potential to turn dangerous. I wonder if Shakespeare had some kind of “hater-feelings” against the actuality of love and blamed women for it. But at the same time it seems that Shakespeare could have considered the fact that because of society’s indiscrimination it wasn’t entirely women’s fault that they invoked corruption, and in a sense Shakespeare intended to give most women credit for not going mad and drowning themselves. The many messages distributed throughout Hamlet can all be seen from different point of views, was Hamlet mad or was he faking it, are women viewed as “whores” or actually accredited in a “hidden” meaning (if they should be accredited why should it even be hidden??), no matter what the true meaning Shakespeare definitely had some talent up his sleeve.
Monday, March 2, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
"are women viewed as “whores”?"
Maddie,
Great post! I think that in this idea of latent sexism, you have the makings of a very interesting essay. You could start even with the single line, "Frailty, thy name is woman"--or with Hamlet's speech to Ophelia when her dad and the king are spying on them. This sounds like an excellent topic (and one that you yourself find compelling to boot).
I'd run with the idea of latent misogyny in the play. Have some fun with this!
I agree with you, Maddie, although I never saw this until you pointed it out. It does seem unfair that only the men get to have their voices and intentions heard. That kind of pisses me off, honestly.
I've always wondered about the whole Gertrude thing to; I mean, was it okay to marry so fast? Or was it as disgusting as Hamlet believed it to be?
Maddie,
I agree with you almost completely. I do feel that a lot of the discrimination present in the book is due to the era that it was written in. However, I do see where you are coming from when speaking of Ophelia's madness. It seems perfectly plausible to me that Shakespeare is trying to show that women are discriminated against and their unfair surroundings eventually lead to suicide. However, there is the contradiction of Gertrude being one of the unlikable characters of the play. The audience doesn't like Gertrude. So I don't know. It's confusing. Way to be an individual and talk about a completely new topic.
Dear Maddie,
First of all i feel like you should get a life and spend less time on your post. Just kidding this is a splendid post. I feel that Shakespeare was kind of sexist, but this was just how women were treated back then. Also Shakespeare could also be showing a point on how discriminating men are to women.
Maddie, I have to say that I agree with most of the strong points that you present in this post. I also do agree with walker in the fact that the sexism is largely due to the time period. it is also apparent to me that Gertrude is easily wooed only a month or so after her beloved husband dies. There is that possibility that Claudius used another one of his potions or poisons to have her fall in love with him
I have to wonder, are the women being taken advantage of in this time of death and sorrow, and then when they waver, they are blamed for not being stronger? It is a very interesting aspect, especially having previously studied Shakespeare's "The Taming of the Shrew" and such. Women's roles are crucial to his commentary, because no, in everyday situations, they really didn't have as much a voice as we women do nowadays. Is Shakespeare's view on women just as sexist as every other male during the time period, or is he trying to break free, subtly, of the common view of women?
In terms of madness, if women are frail, why does Gertrude not swoon to insanity? Or does she -the action of marrying her deceased husband's brother being the result of madness (or can it just be considered sorrow and post-traumatic stress?) Anyways, amazing post, and thanks for the food for thought!
I think you're right about the hidden meaning. I think the obvious sexism in Hamlet goes past the point of demonstrating of how his time viewed women to being satirical and critical of it. Shakespeare is making a statement by making these women so frail and low on the totem pole; not being sexist.
Post a Comment