Wednesday, November 5, 2008
The Case Against
What's the point of this chapter? Rather than praising Flaubert like we would expect Barnes to do, this entire chapter is about his flaws. This entire book seems to be more about his flaws. Flaubert hating humanity, democracy, not involving himself in life, and many other things arent supprising characteristics. Some parts, though, seem to have absolutely no relevance. Why should we care that he shot wild-life in the desert? So much of this book seems to include completely pointless parts that I find more of a waste of time to read than anything. I guess the fact that people "want to know the worst" could be why Barnes chose to include this chapter. If we know the worst about Flauber will we appreciate more? Does his work become of a greater value if we all realize that he's just a completely pessimistic, cynical loner? I think it's sad if this is the case. Either way, the last thing I want to do with my life is read a book about an author who just hated everything about life.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
the point is so we get a different view on flaubert so we can ultimately understand him better
I'd have to agree with you. I feel the same way when I read this book. A lot of the things that come about in this novel are completely random. I don't really understand, actually I completely don't understand why he decides to write like this. It makes me wonder if he writes just what comes to mind and maybe that's how his brain works but it's confusing to me because I'm on a much different level than he is I guess.
I can understand your frustration (and I appreciate your sticking with this novel even though it clearly doesn't appeal to you). You've located, I think, the real significance in this chapter--the notion that (some) people want to know the worst. Perhaps, once the story of his wife (and her "worst") becomes a little clearer, then the book will become a little more meaningful (if not enjoyable).
Good post.
Post a Comment