Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Crooks
When Barnes brought up critics, it made me realize that critics are just people that are insecure about themselves and just have to bring out other peoples flaws. When I look back about thinking about things that critics have said you rarely hear anything good about what they say. Critics just point out things that are just unnecessary such as when a critic found out about how “Piggy is short-sighted; and the spectacles he would have been prescribed for this condition could not possibly have been used as burning glasses.”(77) Barnes makes a good point that most people would not find this flaw in Lord of the Flies and the people that do find this flaw are literature scholars and even then if you know about it doesn’t really ruin the book. The mistake like in Lord of the Flies is an external mistake that didn’t really upset the plot for most. Golding’s error is due to his lack of knowledge of making fires from spectacles. Internal mistakes like Emma’s Eyes being brown, then being blue, are just the author having some “sloppy literary habits”(78) is what Braithwaite thinks about these stupid mistakes. Overall I feel that people make mistakes and critics are the people that just to point them out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Agreed. Critics definetly are like the bullies in the writing world who have nothing better to do than to pick on other people.
You guys may be too harsh on critics (Braithwaite certainly is). What about critics, like Jerry Mark, who try and reveal hidden meanings for other readers by analyzing certain scenes and symbols? Is the entire critical enterprise a waste of time, or does it have some value? (What about a political commentator who offers a critique of a politician's plan (by analyzing what might and might not work about it). Isn't this criticism in its own right?
you make a good point.... hum i'll have to think about that and get back with you.
Post a Comment